0
As Filipinos, We All Belong to the Same Race...why hate one another, then?
Posted on Sunday, 25 February 2018
As Filipinos, We All
Belong to the Same Race
…why hate one another,
then?
By Apolinario Villalobos
The inhabitants of the archipelago that Ruy Lopez de
Villalobos (not related to the author), named “Las Islas de Filipinas” in honor
of his king, Philip II, all belong to one race. There is no reason therefore
for an inhabitant to assert his being different just because he is a Muslim and
lives in Mindanao. Along this line, there is no reason also, for another
inhabitant to assert his being different as a Christian who lives either in
Visayas or Luzon. The “Filipino” that we know today, regardless of his region,
is the result of cultural impregnations by the different races that came to the
archipelago, either to trade or colonize. Most importantly and very clearly,
too, our ancestors were not born Christians and Muslims. They were converted by
missionaries who were converts, themselves!!! How can we be proud then, of such
imposed faith and culture???
Before Mohammed became a prophet, his people were practicing
a different religion. He even went through persecutions before he finally
succeeded in converting his people and such effort that took a route is the one
being followed by those who undertake the “haj”. On the other hand, the Romans
were pagans and it was only through the diligence of St. Paul that Christianity
took a foothold in that city, but still, only after a series of persecution of Christian
missionaries. And, that is how the Roman Catholic religion was developed,
spread to as far as Spain, and finally, brought by the Spanish friars to the
islands of Visayas and Luzon, as well as, a small portion in Mindanao,
particularly, Zamboanga.
The natives of Luzon and Visayas were formerly animists -
worshippers of nature. But, long before
the Spaniards came, Islam as a religion was already widely practiced in the
archipelago. When the Spaniards set foot on the shores of Manila and Visayas,
they already found Mohammedan inhabitants, some of whom they successfully
converted into Christianity. Those from Mindanao, who pestered them with
piratical raids, they called “Moros”, with barbaric connotation, as it was
derived from the “Moors” who were driven out of Spain by Christian Crusaders. This
shows then, that the “Moro” which was originally used by the Spaniards with
reference to the Muslim pirates from Mindanao does not even have the slightest “native”
hint in it. The Spaniards used the reference to show their disgust at the
barbaric ways of those from Mindanao, all of whom they thought were pirates,
robbers, and uncivilized. In other words, such reference was not concocted by
the Mindanao Muslims. So, how can pride emanate from such Spanish-given name
with horrible connotation?
Our ancestors were never referred to as “Filipinos” during
the Hispanic regime. During the time, the “Filipinos” referred to, were
actually the indolent Spanish settlers who lived comfortably in Manila out of
the revenue derived from the galleon trade. When the trade faltered, the
Spanish king was even forced to send financial replenishment for their sustenance,
resulting to the clamor to abandon Manila. These colonists occupied the
minuscule stronghold and walled city of Intramuros – the Manila of the old.
The affluent natives were called “Indios”. Those who lived
far from the moot-ringed walled city were the Chinese who were forcibly
clustered in Parian by the Spaniards with an objective to control their
movement. The Parian eventually became the present-day Chinatown, reputed as
the oldest in the world. The non-converted Mohammedan natives dwelt along the
length of the Pasig River, and as far as Tondo. The friars even called the
natives ugly “chonggos” (monkeys)! So how can we be proud of our so-called
Hispanic past, when our ancestors were also treated as serfs who provided
forced labor in building galleons and churches?
The only time the natives were called “Filipinos” was when
the Americans took over the reins of the colony. But, still in the eyes of the
new colonists, the natives were still a helpless lot who need succor and further
conversion as if Catholicism was not enough, that is why they brought in their
own Protestant missionaries and teachers who forced the natives to sing “The
Star Spangled Banner”.
That is how we were pitifully victimized as a race and
treated as ignoramus, when in fact, before the two groups of colonizers came,
the natives were already enjoying a brisk trade with the neighboring southeast
Asian states and kingdoms, even Japan and China. Mindanao had its own “royal
houses”, too. Our ancestors were already weaving fabrics, manufacturing
cannons, and mining for gold. The primary reason why the Spaniards came was to
take over the wealth of the natives and bring them back to Spain. And, history
books are clear on that. The natives of the archipelago were never helpless. The
conversion into Christianity was just secondary and even still with
questionable sincerity.
On the other hand, had there been a reversal of events, in
which the Arab missionaries concentrated their evangelization effort in Luzon
and Visayas, those who are living in these islands would be clinging to the
Islamic faith. And, had the Spaniards decided to drop anchor in Sulu or
Zamboanga, to put up permanent colonial outposts, those who are living in the
whole of Mindanao including Sulu, Tawi-tawi, and Sabah groups of islands would have
been embracing Roman Catholicism.
The Filipinos as a race are victims of historic events that
dwelt on the scramble for overseas colonization by former western powers such
as Spain, Portugal, Holland, and England. We are now suffering from identity
crisis due to imposed faiths and cultures. Worse, this dilemma threatens the
unity of the whole archipelago. And still worst, the effort to unite is greatly
hampered by an inutile and deteriorating government due to incorrigible
corruption. Fortunately, Duterte surfaced by virtue of a popular election, as a
crime-busting President.
The mistake of the early political leaders was their failure
to change the name of the archipelago into something more nationalistic and encompassing
when “Commonwealth” status was granted by the United States. The early leaders’
minds were focused on the imposed erudite Hispanic and American cultures. They
forgot that somewhere down south, there were other inhabitants, albeit, with
different faiths and dialects - the Muslims and Lumads.
The so-called “Filipino” historic leaders whose questionable
reputations are beginning to be exposed today had a short-ranged view. They did
not consider the geographical situation of the country when they came up with a
governing system, such that control may pose a problem in time due to its
fragmented situation, which is happening right now. They adopted the unicameral
system of other countries, but in framing the Constitution, they followed the
“structure and formal appearance” of America’s own. Curiously, they did not
copy the Federal system of the Americans who introduced “democracy”. Is it
because they did not want to share the authority with those living in the far
south? Does this show that greed for power has prevailed as early as that time
to benefit a handful pretentious “Filipinos” who framed the hybrid Basic Law of
the country, but which proved to be a flop today, despite two revisions?
As a native of this archipelago, I ask: why do we have to begrudge
one another today, just because we differ in faith and dialect? Is it the fault of those living in Luzon and
Visayas that Mindanao is being neglected by the dysfunctional government? The
“enemies” are the faulty government system and corrupt officials. The solution
to the problem is not the separation from the organic homogenous system to
become a separate state or annexation to another country. There are options
that can put an end to the problem on unity, among which could be the federal
system, relocation of the seat of the central government somewhere at the
midpoint of the archipelago, or review of the current Autonomous Region for
Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) to make it more service-oriented. But the eventual
solution could be the 24-degree turnaround in our attitude as inhabitants of
this archipelago, specifically in the way officials are chosen that is
shamelessly hinged on vote-buying!
It is a disgrace, indeed, that we, as a people who came from
the same stock should hate one another based on what were imposed on us to
become what we are now – Christians and Muslims. We should, instead, fight for
our real identity, to enable us to maintain our unity.
