Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts

0

Ang Kalagayan ng Pilipinas Ngayon

Posted on Friday, 22 June 2018


ANG KALAGAYAN NG PILIPINAS NGAYON
Ni Apolinario Villalobos

HINDI KAILANGANG MAGING PANTAS O WISE ANG ISANG PILIPINO UPANG MAUNAWAAN ANG MGA NANGYAYARI SA PILIPINAS MULA PA NOON NA NAGDULOT NG PAGHIHIRAP NG NAPAKALAKING BAHAGI NG SAMBAYANAN, TULAD NG:

·        ----Hilaw ang demokrasya ng Pilipinas. Noon pa man ay ayaw pa ng ilang Amerikanong mambabatas na bigyan agad ng kalayaan ang bansa subalit nagpilit ang mga apuradong pulitiko na may pansariling layunin kaya nagkaroon agad ng Commonwealth.

·       ---- Hindi lahat ng naging presidente mula pa noon ay 100% na malinis at pwedeng masabing “modelo” ng ugaling Pilipino. Si Quezon ay matinding magmura pero sa Kastila nga lang…si Qurino ay sinasabing may “golden arenola”, etc.

·        ---Panahon pa lang ng Amerikano, may mga iskwater nang naninirahan sa loob ng Intramuros at baybayin ng Tondo na bandang huli ay umabot sa tinawag na Isla Puting Bato at Baseco Compound. Hind sila nakontrol ng mga umupong presidente noon kaya dumami nang dumami…lalo pa at ginamit sila ng mga tiwaling pulitiko bilang mga “boto” na kailangan nila tuwing eleksiyon. Sila din ang mga hinahakot ng gobyerno at ng leftist groups tuwing may rally….mga bayarang makabayan kuno.

·        ---May nagpapagalaw sa mga grupong “makabayan” kuno na halatang walang direksiyon. Tuwing may uupong bagong presidente ay kinakalaban nila…tinatawag na tuta ng Amerika. NGAYON KAY DUTERTE AY HINDI NILA MAGAWA YAN…LALONG HINDI NILA MATAWAG NA TUTA SIYA NG AMERIKA.  Nagkaroon ng problema ang bansa laban sa Tsina dahil sa West Philippine Sea or South China Sea pero sa harap sila ng US embassy nagra-rally hindi sa labas ng Chinese embassy. Maraming alam ang mga grupong ito pero ang nakakapagtaka ay parang wala silang alam tungkol sa CIA ng Amerika.

·        ----Ginagamit na stepping stone ng mga ambisyoso ang mga grupong makabayan upang maabot ang mas mataas na “puwesto” sa senado o kongreso kaya napapaghalata ang makasarili nilang layunin dahil kahit nasa bulwagan na sila ng mga batasan ay wala pa rin silang nagawang tulong sa masa….lalong lumawak ang saklaw ng squatting sa Manila at malalaking lunsod….may unemployment pa rin, yon nga lang ay seasonal dahil sa contractualization, kaya gutom pa rin ang inaabot ng maraming pamilya kapag “finished contract” na ang kumakayod para sa pamilya.

·        ---Hindi nawawala ang cartel sa bigas dahil hindi na bumalik sa dating presyo ang staple food na ito ng mga Pilipino….halatang may nagkokontrol na grupo. Ang nakakabahala ay ang hindi napapansing pagmahal ng mga de-boteng tubig na baka sa bandang huli ay magiging mas mahal pa kaysa kurudo o gasoline.

·        MAY MGA NAKAUPO PA RING MGA LINTA  AT TAMAD SA MARAMING PUWESTO NG IBA’T IBANG ANTAS NG GOBYERNO AT MGA AHENSIYA….MGA  WALANG PAKIALAM SA MGA DAPAT NILANG AKSYUNAN AYON SA KANILANG JOB DESCRIPTION. MGA NAGHIHINTAY NG UTOS NI PRESIDENTE, O NI GOVERNOR, O NI MAYOR….MGA WALANG PAGKUKUSA AT KAPAG PUMUTOK ANG MGA KAPALPAKAN AY SAKA MAGTUTURUAN AT MAGSISIHAN. SI KAWAWANG “BADYET” ANG PALAGING NASISISI….NA PARA BANG LAHAT NG MAY KINALAMAN SA IKAGAGANDA HALIMBAWA NG PALIGID AY KAILANGANG GASTUSAN NG MALAKI, GANOONG PWEDE NAMANG MAGTANIM NG MGA HALAMAN AT PUNO AT MAY GAGAWA NAMAN DAHIL KASAMA SA TRABAHO NILA.

0

The Birthplace or Hometown and Democratic Life

Posted on Monday, 10 April 2017

The Birthplace or Hometown
And Democratic Life
By Apolinario Villalobos

The “birthplace” in case we are an indigenous resident, or “hometown” in case we are an immigrant/migrant is the only place that we can officially claim as our “place of residence”. Common sense then, dictates that we should love and respect it. We should not badmouth it, rather, if not satisfied with the prevailing situation or how it is administered politically, we have an option to move out and transfer to another place that suits us. We should not be grossly ingrate to the town, city, province, or country that provides us with a niche. It should be noted that whatever dissatisfaction develops in us points to the people who administer the locality we live in, NOT THE PLACE, so that there is no sense in destroying its image. It has got nothing to do with the proliferation of drugs, or any crime for that matter, or if developments did not happen as expected…BLAME THE CONCERNED AUTHORITIES. IF YOU SOLD YOUR VOTE DURING THE ELECTION…BLAME YOURSELF!

The place where we live permanently or temporarily is what we write down in documents required in any legal transaction as “residence”, whether we like it or not….. or whether we hate or love it…..we got no choice. Without such information, we become “stateless”. In this regard, as we are citizens of a democratic country, we live by the rule of the majority. We have the right to make protests against any act of our leaders that do not suit our taste but should be ready with options to support our stand….and, protests should be done with sanity and sense. It is our right to belong to the opposition, albeit, minority in number. But, again, we must abide by the rule of the majority….because, IT IS ASSUMED that in a democratic country, the majority rules…if it does not happen, we are bound to suffer.

The best thing that we can do if we persist on living in a certain place despite dissatisfaction is to cooperate as best as we could. For our consolation, we should look at the brighter side of our locality and not meddle in politics, as much as possible, for it may just aggravate our bad feelings. We should open our eyes and look around us to know where we could pour in our support. And, we could best do it if we are non-political so that regardless of who wins in an election, we can still wholeheartedly extend our hand without any trace of pretension.


Finally, the focus of our loyalty should be the “place” not the “people” who administer it.

0

Ang Pilipinas Bilang Isang Bansang Demokratiko

Posted on Thursday, 8 December 2016

Ang Pilipinas Bilang Isang Bansang Demokratiko
Ni Apolinario Villalobos

Sa isang demokratikong bansa ay may mga grupong nagtatagisan ng lakas upang ang mananaig o mananalo ay siyang magkokontrol sa pagpapatakbo nito. Mapalad ang mga bansang “matured” ang mga pulitiko kaya ang mga talunan ay tinatanggap ang pangyayari kahit hindi bukal sa kanilang kalooban at bumabati pa sa mga nanalo….ang halimbawa dito ay ang Amerika. Pero  iba sa Pilipinas.

Minadali ang pagtanim ng demokrasya sa Pilipinas na kinopya sa Amerika. Dahil diyan, matatawag na pilit sa pagkahinog ang kasarinlan ng Pilipinas. At, dahil pa rin diyan, sa Pilipinas, walang kandidatong natalo, sa halip ay dinaya daw ng nanalo. Nagtatagisan ng galing ang mga uupong pinuno at gusto nilang maalala sila pagbaba nila kaya ang mga proyekto ng pinalitang administrasyon kahit anong galing ay winawasak upang palitan ng bagong upong pinuno at may tatak pa ng initial ng pangalan niya.

Sa Pilipinas, sa halip na magtulungan ang mga nanalo (majority) at mga kaalyado ng mga natalo (minority), sila ay nagsisilipan ng mga pagkakamali kaya sa halip na sumulong ang bansa, ito ay napipigilan sa pag-usad. Kahit anong ganda ng layunin ng proyekto ng nakaupong pinuno, ito ay pilit na kinukulapulan ng putik ng kontra-partido upang palabasing mali siya. May mga nagbabayad pa ng ilang tauhan ng media upang tumulong sa pagpapakalat ng mga negatibong ulat tungkol sa nakaupong pinuno.

Tama lang na may mga taong dapat “magbantay” sa nakaupong pinuno, pero ang hindi maganda ay ang kawalan na ng katuturan sa mga ginagawa ng kontra-partidong pagsabotahe kaya nadadamay ang taong bayan at bansa sa kabuuhan nito. Ang isang paraan ay ang pagpipilit sa nakaupong pinuno na ilahad ang lahat ng kanyang mga “strategies” kahit magreresulta ito sa pagkawasak ng seguridad ng bansa. Ito ay pagpapakita ng kawalan ng tiwala sa namumuno dahil ayaw nilang bigyan ng pagkakataong magpakita ito ng kanyang kakayahan. At, kapag nagtagumpay ang mga naninira sa kanya pero nakadamay naman sa kapakanan ng buong bansa, siyempre, masisisi ang nakaupong pinuno dahil siya ay nabigo, yon nga lang ay sa maduming paraan.

Sa ganang ito, kung ilalahad ni Duterte ang lahat ng strategy niya sa pagpuksa ng salot na dulot ng droga sa bansa, paano pa siyang magtatagumpay dahil malalaman na ng mga kalaban ang mga gagawin niya? Kung mga “ugat” ng droga ang pag-uusapan, halos lahat sila ay nasa kulungan na subalit dahil hindi pa tuluyang nalinis ang mga ahensiyang dapat tumulong sa kanya, maingat ang mga hakbang niya. May mga pahaging o insinuation siya na alam niyang nasa paligid lang niya ang “ninja cops”, pero ang mga ito ang nakakaalam kung sino ang pinabebenta nila ng droga sa kalye na pansamantalang natigil. At, ang ginagawa naman ng mga pulis na ito ay pinapatay ang mga dati nilang drug pushers upang hindi sila maituro. Alam na yan ng media pero nag-iingat sila sa pag-ulat. Kung minsan nga lang ay nadudulas ang ilang broadcasters dahil lumalabas sa kanilang editorial commentaries.

Kung tatanggalin ni Duterte sa serbisyo ang mga “ninja cops”, sigurado kayang hindi pa rin sila makakapagpabenta ng droga sa pamamagitan ng mga bagong drug pushers dahil pinatay na nila ang mga dati… kung totoo nga ang kumakalat na bulungan? Samantala, ang drogang nakupit sa mga nakumpiska sa pamamagitan ng mga legitimate raid ay siguradong alam din ni Duterte na nakatabi o nakabaon lang at hindi mapapanis kaya pwedeng ibenta pagkalipas ng 6 na taong wala na siya kaya palagi niyang sinasabi na “in my time, gusto kong mawala ang droga”.  Ang mga tiwaling pulis din na ito ang nakakaalam kung sino ang mga “small time” drug lords  na nasa labas ng kulungan. Kaya bakit niya ididispatsa ang mga paggagalingan ng mga impormasyong kailangang-kailangan upang kahit papaano ay mabawasan man lang ang mga sangkot sa droga?

Ano man ang plano ni Duterte sa mga tiwaling pulis at iba pang sangkot sa krimeng ito, siya lang ang nakakaalam. Siguradong nag-iingat lang siya dahil ang “demokrasya” na umiiral sa Pilipinas ay mistulang nagahasa…luray-luray…lupaypay… kaya hindi maaasahang makakapagbigay ng proteksiyon lalo na sa mga taong may mabuting layunin.



0

No Virtuous Leader of a Nation can Stand Against a Corrupted Democracy

Posted on Monday, 31 October 2016

No Virtuous Leader of a Nation Can Stand
Against a Corrupted Democracy
By Apolinario Villalobos

Democracy was conceived with a noble purpose of providing a comfortable life for its adherents, and was given substance by freedom, free will, liberty, equality, and many other principles that stand for anything “free”. It is unfortunate, however, that the looseness brought forth by freedom has caused its decadence today. The systems of all democratic nations are practically loop-holed with omissions and defects giving corrupt government officials the chance to commit frauds at will. Democracy has been so abused lately, that its image has been deformed beyond recognition.

America which is considered by other nations as the cradle of world democracy is showing signs of decadence as abusive acts have practically become part of its citizens’ daily life. Guns can be easily purchased and even youngsters can carry them around. Muggings are prevalent making stringent laws seem useless. Parents are humbled by their children who talk back at them every time their attention is called for committed faults, and the former cannot do anything, as they will be reported to the police. These undisciplined children later grow up to become young single moms, muggers, gun-toting students, rapists, etc. It is true that similar crimes are committed in any democratic nation, but the degree of incidence in America is beyond expectation.

Nations that are internationally-acknowledged as strictly disciplined like Japan, South Korea, and Singapore are not free from the abuse committed by their supposedly, equally well-disciplined constituents, at the first sign of opportunity. Corruption in their government is also a ubiquitous happening just like in other countries of their level. Along this line, the onslaught of corruption is such that not even a spiritual nation like Vatican is free from it. No less than the new pope himself, Francis, has called the attention of the erring clerics to mend their ways. In other words, no amount of discipline and spirituality can match the evil of corruption that has become deeply-rooted in the midst of humanity.

It must be noted, however, that the uncontrollability of corruption even by a virtuous leader does not free him from the liability for any commission by his officials. On the contrary, as a leader, he is expected to exhaust all means and exert an extra effort in preventing the fraudulent acts, or make necessary corrective moves, and not just look the other way every time they are committed. Tolerance on his part makes him liable or a party to the act.  Not even his assertion of purported ignorance makes him innocent. Somehow, the preventive or corrective effort of the virtuous leader, though how futile they may seem, can at least, minimize the incidence or effect of corruption…a consolation that can appease the victims.


As for the seemingly “unblemished” constituents of the corrupted democratic nations, perhaps, they can exert an extra effort in persisting to be consistent in acting as expected of them… law-abiding citizens, whose collective effort can somehow resuscitate the ailing Democracy.

0

No Virtuous Leader of a Nation can Stand Against a Corrupted Democracy

Posted on Friday, 16 October 2015

No Virtuous Leader of a Nation Can Stand
Against a Corrupted Democracy
By Apolinario Villalobos

Democracy was conceived with a noble purpose of providing a comfortable life for its adherents, and was given substance by freedom, free will, liberty, equality, and many other principles that stand for anything “free”. It is unfortunate, however, that the looseness brought by freedom has caused its decadence today. The systems of all democratic nations are practically loop-holed with omissions and defects giving corrupt government officials the chance to commit frauds at will. Democracy has been so abused lately, that its image has been deformed beyond recognition.

America which is considered by other nations as the cradle of world democracy is showing signs of decadence as abusive acts have practically become part of its citizens’ daily life. Guns can be easily purchased and even youngsters can carry them around. Muggings are prevalent making stringent laws seem useless. Parents are humbled by their children who talk back at them every time their attention is called for committed faults, and the former cannot do anything, as they will be reported to the police. These undisciplined children later grow up to become young single moms, muggers, gun-toting students, rapists, etc. It is true that similar crimes are committed in any democratic nation, but the degree of incidence in America is beyond expectation.

Nations that are internationally-acknowledged as strictly disciplined like Japan, South Korea, and Singapore are not free from the abuse committed by their supposedly, equally well-disciplined constituents, at the first sign of opportunity. Corruption in their government is also a ubiquitous happening just like in other countries of their level. Along this line, the onslaught of corruption is such that not even a spiritual nation like Vatican is free from it. No less than the new pope himself, Francis, has called the attention of the erring clerics to mend their ways. In other words, no amount of discipline and spirituality can match the evil of corruption that has become deeply-rooted in humanity.

It must be noted, however, that the uncontrollability of corruption even by a virtuous leader does not free him from the liability for any commission by his officials. On the contrary, as a leader, he is expected to exhaust all means and exert an extra effort in preventing the fraudulent acts, or make necessary corrective moves, and not just look the other way every time they are committed. Tolerance on his part makes him liable or a party to the act.  Not even his assertion of purported ignorance makes him innocent. Somehow, the preventive or corrective effort of the virtuous leader, though how futile they may seem, can at least, minimize the incidence or effect of corruption…a consolation that can appease the victims.


As for the seemingly “unblemished” constituents of the corrupted democratic nations, perhaps, they can exert an extra effort in persisting to be consistent in acting as expected of them… law-abiding citizens, an act that can somehow resuscitate Democracy as it grasps for precious breath.

0

Tao ang Nagpapasama sa Relihiyon, Ideyolohiya, at Magandang Adbokasiya

Posted on Wednesday, 30 September 2015

Tao ang Nagpapasama sa Relihiyon, Ideyolohiya
At Magandang Adbokasiya
ni Apolinario Villalobos

Walang masamang ideyolohiya tulad ng Komunismo o Demokrasya kung maganda at maayos ang pagpapatupad ng mga namumuno. Walang masamang relihiyon o pananampalataya kung ang ituturo ng mga namumuno ay pawang pagmamahal sa Diyos, o “diyos”, at kapwa tao. Walang masamang adbokasiya kung hindi ito gagamitin sa masama lalo na sa panlalamang ng kapwa. Tao ang dahilan kung bakit may mga kaguluhan sa mundo, dahil sa pagpapairal niya ng kasakiman at kayabangan.

Napakaganda sana ang layunin ng Demokrasya, kung ang nakaupong Presidente, halimbawa, ng isang bansang may ganitong ideyolohiya ay hindi bobo, sakim o kawatan. Ganoon din ang Komunismo, kung ang Chairman ng bansang may ganitong uri ng pamahalaan ay hindi malupit at gahaman sa kapangyarihan, at hindi sagad -buto ang ugaling mapangkamkam.

Sa Demokrasya, lahat ng mga prinsipyo at alituntunin na may kinalaman dito ay pawang kabutihan ang pakay. Halimbawa na lamang ay ang mga batas ng Pilipinas na mismong mga taga-Kongreso at Senado ang may gawa.  Dahil ampaw ang pagkagawa nila ng mga batas, nagawa din nilang paikutan ang mga ito upang makapagnakaw sa kaban ng bayan. Ang kapangyarihan ng isang Presidente ng demokratikong bansa ay para sana sa kapakanan ng taong bayan at ng bansa mismo, sa kabuuhan nito. Subalit, dahil sa panunulsul ng mga tiwaling umaalalay sa kanya, nagawa niyang lokohin ang mga mamamayan. Ang masisisi sa pagkakaroon ng maraming kapalpakan sa isang bansa ay ang Presidente at ang kanyang mga kaalyado, at hindi ang kanilang mga “puwesto” na ginamit nila sa paggawa ng masama.

Ang relihiyon naman ay naimbento ng tao dahil sa kanyang pananampalataya sa kinikilalang Diyos o “diyos”. Bago pa man nagkaroon ng mga relihiyon na nagsanga mula sa pananampalataya ni Moses at Abraham sa disyerto ng Gitnang Silangan, mayroon nang mga pananampalataya sa “lakas” ng iba’t ibang “diyos” na pinaniwalaan ng mga pagano. Pinagkaisa ng mga pananampalatayang ito ang mga tao, yon nga lang ay kanya-kanyang kumpulan ang nangyari at nagtagisan sila ng lakas, na naging sanhi ng kaguluhan. Pinairal kasi nila ang kayabangan at pagkagahaman sa kapangyarihan.

Isa ang Kristiyanismo sa mga naging sanga ng pananampalataya na sinimulan ni Moses sa disyerto ng Gitnang Silangan. Habang napanatili ng mga Hudyo ang pagsunod sa mga sinimulan ni Moses, ang iba naman ay nagpasimula ng sarili nilang relihiyon batay sa mga itinuro ni Hesukristo kaya nagkaroon ng Kristiyanismo. Subali’t kalaunan, nang gamitin ng mga Romanong Emperador ang Kristiyanismo upang mapalawak ang kanilang nasasakupan at mapalakas ang kanilang kapangyarihan, ang naging katawagan dito ay naging “Romano Katoliko”, na  hinaluan nila ng mga ritwal na pagano, dahil ang mga ito ang tinutumbok ng kanilang layuning mahikayat. Nahati rin ang simbahang Katoliko sa dalawa kaya nagkaroon ng “Orthodox” na humiwalay sa “Romano”. Pinatili ng “Orthodox” ang mga orihinal na gawi, samantalang maraming binago ang “Romano”.

Noong panahong mismong mga emperador ng Roma ang naging “papa” o “pope”, nagkabentahan pa ng indulhensiya o indulgence upang “mawala” daw ang kasalanan ng mga mananampalatayang bibili nito! Ang mga nagsulputang grupo ng “Bagong Kristiyano” naman ay malabnaw  ang pagkilala kay Maria na “ina” ni Hesus. Dahil sa mga nagsuluputang sekta at kulto sa kasalukuyang panahon, lalong nagkaroon ng kalituhan sa pananampalataya dahil bawa’t grupo ay nagpipilit na sila ang “tama”.

Samantala, ang adbokasiyang pagtulong sa kapwa ay nagbunga ng mga Non-governmental Organizations o NGO. Sa simula, ang pondo ay galing sa mismong bulsa ng mga pilantropong nagtatag ng mga NGO. Kalaunan, sila ay tinulungan ng ibang mas malaking NGO. At, kalaunan pa, tumulong din ang mga NGO sa gobyerno upang mabilis na maipaabot ang tulong sa mga taong mahihirap, kaya “pinadaan” sa kanila ang pondo ng mga proyekto. Ang paraang “pagpapadaan” ng pondo sa mga NGO na may layuning malinis ay “nasilip” ng mga gahaman upang magamit sa pagnakaw ng pera mula sa kaban ng bayan. Nagkaroon ng kutsabahan sa pagitan ng mga taga-gobyerno at may-ari ng NGO, kaya ngayon ay may mga kasong tulad ng kinakaharap ni Napoles na may kinalaman sa pagnakaw nila ng bilyon-bilyong pera mula sa kaban ng bayan!


Sa bandang huli…ang katanungang maibabato na lang natin sa hangin, kasabay ng isang malalim na buntong hininga  ay, “…tao…tao…bakit ka pa ginawa upang mabuhay sa mundo?”

0

Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan, Almost Got Separated from the Jurisdiction of the Philippine Government...during the American Regime

Posted on Tuesday, 22 September 2015

Mindanao, Sulu, and Palawan, Almost Got Separated
From the Jurisdiction of the Philippine Government
…during the American Regime
Apolinario Villalobos

In November 1923, the American Chamber of Commerce of Mindanao and Sulu made a proposal to make the Muslim area as an unorganized domain directly under the rule of the Americans. A distinct system of government suited for the area was suggested. However, the proposal was not given much attention, until the Bacon Bill revived the issue.

The sponsors of the Bacon Bill expressed that they just wanted to protect the “defenseless and unarmed, though proud and self-respecting Moros”. As expected, the Filipino leaders opposed the Bill, as they saw the hidden motive behind it which was the exploitation of the areas for rubber production in favor of the American interest. During the time, about more than three million hectares of land in Mindanao were suitable for the cultivation of rubber tree. The Filipinos vehemently insisted that, would there be foreign investors interested in seizing the opportunity of cultivating rubber in Mindanao, it should be fairly done under the administration of the Philippine Government.

As a last desperate argument, proponents of the proposal also insisted that the Moros in Mindanao were never desirous of independence, but prefer to remain under the sovereignty and protection of the Americans. They cited an incident in the past, whereby, Moro leaders supposedly, petitioned the Governor General and the US Congress about such desire. Unfortunately, this allegation was not factually established, as some parties insisted that Filipino Muslims did not really want to separate from their Christian brothers and sisters, but to have independence with them.

The importune Bacon Bill, fortunately, did not illicit support from then, President Collidge and the US Congress. Lately, there’s another move to separate the Moroland from the archipelago via the “original” Bangsamoro Basic Law but was fortunately reviewed for revision before it got implemented. The separation proposal was championed by the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, under Iqbal, and ably supported by Ferrer and Deles, two government representatives in the negotiation panel for peace in Mindanao. The proposal is now assuming another name, “Basic Law for Bangsamoro Autonomous Region” which is more appropriate to be consistent with the rest of the other autonomous regions that are already in place. History repeats itself, indeed….


0

The Philippines: from the Commonwealth to the Present

Posted on Friday, 18 September 2015

The Philippines: from Commonwealth
to the Present
By Apolinario Villalobos

From the Philippine Commonwealth that evolved into Republican form, despite the many years that transpired, until the current administration of Pnoy, the promises of presidential candidates did not change their course which is supposedly towards the uplift of Filipinos and the advancement of the country, but nothing happened of them. The graft and corruption in the government just got worse, much more with poverty.

The Commonwealth government under Quezon was cut short by the WWII. But during his time, the Americans already observed the culture-based administration of the government which was hinged on “gratitude”, “brotherhood”, and “kinship”. The Post-war era of independence saw the granting of independence to the country, transforming the Commonwealth to Republican under Osmeῆa. As the country was still reeling from the effects of the WWII, it was in total disarray. This situation bred profiteering on the part of the businessmen and graft on the part of the government officials, resulting to the much dissatisfaction and dismay of the masses.

The dissatisfaction of the Filipinos was perceived as an opportunity of enterprising and ambitious politicians for grabbing the power from Osmeῆa. As a last effort, Osmeῆa reorganized the government by signing an Executive Order in March 7, 1945, restoring the Executive departments. Unfortunately, Osmeῆa was perceived as lame by the then, Governor-General, MacArthur, who coerced him to convene Congress. Many were against the convening of Congress, then, as it might fall into the hands of the “collaborators” of the WWII, one of whom was Manuel Roxas who fortunately, despite his being a former “collaborator”, was favored by the support of MacArthur.

Among those that the newly-convened Congress approved was a three-year back pay to its members, which was equivalent to the three-year Japanese occupation of the country. It was a telling premonition of more self-serving Congressional actions to happen. The employees followed suit with their own demand for similar back pay covering the same period but was not granted due to unavailability of fund. The cunning Roxas perceived the dissatisfaction of the employees as an opportunity to back up his bid for presidency. He authored the Back Pay Law which was eventually passed in 1948. It gave three years back pay to all pre-war government employees in 1958, after a ten-year period during which the government would have already saved enough funds.

The country did not gain much from Roxas when he held the reins of the government. Graft and corruption still proliferated. But his prominence became more pronounced when the provision on Parity Rights of the Americans was inserted in the Philippine Constitution. Hours before he died, he again committed the loyalty of the Filipinos to the Americans. His true color as “collaborator”, first with the Japanese during WWII, and later, with the Americans, surfaced till the time he drew his last breath.

Quirino took over the presidency when Roxas died. He promised “government reorganization to achieve efficiency at all levels of the bureaucracy, immediate increased production to give employment to thousands of idle laborers, vigorous and honest enforcement of tax laws, the preservation of the national integrity, and continued friendly relations with the countries of the world”. The Hukbalahap movement just became active because of unresolved agrarian issues during Quirino’s administration, and due to the worsening corruption. He wisely gave an all-out support to his Secretary of National Defense, Ramon Magsaysay who was perceived as honest and with unquestionable ability to lead, who somehow mellowed the administration’s strong image of ineptness . The charisma of Magsaysay brought him nearer to the masses.

When Magsaysay became president with the help of the CIA, he unfortunately, went beyond the tolerable treatment of the masses. His pampering of the masses, made them over-dependent to the government, resulting to their idleness. He went to the extent of opening the gates of Malacaῆan to them, practically resulting to the presidential official residence’s transformation into a “park”.  During his term, he promised, the improvement of the land tenure system with land resettlements, easy-term credit for the peasants, intense community development founded on self-help. To support those promises, the National Resettlement and Rehabilitation Administration (NARRA) in Palawan was established in 1955, as well as, the Farmers’ Cooperative and Marketing Association (FACOMA). It was also during this time that Visayans and those from the north, rushed to Mindanao to clear cogon-covered fields. To date, among the results of the resettlement effort were General Santos and Koronadal cities. General Santos City was formerly, “Dadiangas”, while Koronadal City was formerly, “Marbel”.

Magsaysay realizing his mistakes for pampering the common “tao”, was reported to have lost his temper several times, one of which was when he “exploded”, saying: “the people want me to do everything for them!”. His ten-point program was never realized when he met an accident while on board the presidential airplane in March 17, 1957 on the way back to Manila from a speaking engagement in Cebu. The ill-fated airplane was later found on Mt. Manunggal in Cebu. Vice-President Carlos P. Garcia took over the presidency with the demise of Magsaysay. It was alleged that Magsaysay did a corrupt act by posting newspapermen in important government offices, as well as, extended to them favors that not even government officials were lucky to have a share.

The presidential election in 1957 confirmed the presidency of Garcia, although, the said process was said to be the noisiest and most expensive in the country’s history until the time. It was during this time that the Catholic Church was dragged into the chaos, which however, proved that the votes of the Catholics were not reliably solid. Diosdado Macapagal who belonged to the opposition won as Vice-President.

During his term, Garcia promised: “to complete the Philippine economic independence through the adoption of the Filipino First Policy….; to establish Filipino dignity as a free people by dealing with foreign powers on terms of sovereign equality; to achieve a balanced economy by providing equal impetus to agriculture and industry; to promote social justice and the general welfare of the masses, and; to minimize and, if possible, to eradicate graft and corruption”. Just like his predecessors however, Garcia also failed, as the poor not only multiplied but continued to suffer from poverty, while the economy was at its worse.

The people’s disillusionment of how Garcia administered the government, steered Diosdado Macapagal towards victory when he made a bid for presidency. Graft and corruption were the focus of all issues against Garcia which Macapagal used to his advantage. When he won, Macapagal promised: “the immediate restoration of economic stability, alleviate the common man’s plight, and establish a dynamic basis for future growth.” He added to strengthen the deteriorating moral fiber of the people. Unfortunately, a few months after he was sworn in, his province mates indulged in extravagant celebrations, with him and his family at the center. Such flagrant show of opulence went on which slighted the Filipinos much. Macapagal will however, be remembered with his nationalistic decision to move the Philippine Independence Day from July 4 to June 12, and the Land Reform Code which unfortunately was not implemented effectively.

The nepotism, graft and corruption issues were used by Ferdinand Marcos against Macapagal when the former ran for president. The Filipinos, for having no choice and who had been clamoring for change, voted for him.

Among the presidents, it was Marcos who openly admitted that the country was in a dire crisis situation, and to arrest the further deterioration of the country, he promised: “self-sufficiency in the production of rice and the diversification of crops, implementation of the land reform program, and intensification of the community development program. During his time, the country experienced a phenomenal infra-structure boom, to support the drummed up tourism and industrialization efforts of the government. Not satisfied with the Constitution-mandated tenure, he declared Martial Law, to supposedly prevent the Communist take-over of the country. The drastic move was accepted for several years by the Filipinos, until the issue on the murder of Benigno Aquino erupted.

The People Power Revolution in 1987 toppled the dictatorship of Marcos and installed Cory Aquino as President. Issues that her administration faced were recovery of the people’s money, replenishment of the dried up budget, and corruption that was not totally swept out of the system. Her tenure did not accomplish much for the recovery of the country until she was taken over by Fidel Ramos during whose administration there was a spree of privatization and selling of government properties. As the Filipinos got tired of the same economic and political mishaps of presidents, they gave a chance to Joseph Estrada from the movie world, and who promised “heaven”, and something “new”…indeed, corruption with a “new” face, that just got worse. The recurring despair of the people brought Gloria Arroyo to power. Despair again made the Filipinos look for another leader, and this time they bit the bait dangled by the old-time crooks who used the “martyrdom” of Ninoy Aquino to push the presidency of Pnoy Aquino….


The rest is history, literally, because as stated in the pages of the Philippine history, the same problems are the issues today– graft, corruption, nepotism, poverty, colonial attachment to the United States, and weak leadership.

0

Agrarian Strife...root of poverty and Red Movement in the Philippines

Posted on Saturday, 5 September 2015

Agrarian Strife…root of poverty
and Red Movement in the Philippines
by Apolinario Villalobos

During the pre-Spanish time, nothing was on record about any agrarian discontent in the country, as it developed only when the Spaniards came and imposed their “encomienda” system. The practice was maintained by the Americans who took over the grip on colonial reins, and worsened when the country became a Republic under corrupt Filipino leaders.

The country is an agricultural nation. But, because of agrarian problems in the provinces, the starving Filipinos sought a better life in the city, where they lived on pavements, under the bridge, along waterways, and slums. In the city they still suffer from poverty, but they are on their own, their life not controlled by landlords who bound them in perpetual debt. They rummage in dump sites for morsels of food and recyclable stuff that they sell to junkshops. Most often what they earn is not enough so that rather than stare at their children dying of hunger, they commit crimes – some petty, some grave. They resort to “running” drugs for pushers, go into prostitution, pick pockets, break into homes, and steal goods in groceries. Had life been good in the province where they tended rice fields and vegetable plots, they would have not spent precious savings for fare to Manila to seek a better life, but found another hell, instead.

The advocates of Communism saw an opportunity in the poor Filipinos’ discontent. They sowed the seeds of the Red ideology among them - successfully. The mass base of the Red Movement has become firmer and broader. Not content in Manila, young Red agents go to the provinces which before were peaceful tourist destinations, especially, the island provinces. In cooperation with the New People’s Army, they meld with the villagers who have been suffering from the exploitation of their landlords, and who did not need any elaborate persuasion….more success.

Meanwhile, instead of resolving the issue on agrarian unrest, the government since the time of Marcos is more interested in developing rice and corn fields into high-end subdivisions and malls. Foreigners in drove took the opportunity using their Filipino dummies. The idea of the government is to make the country at par with neighboring Asian counties that are resplendent in their progress, as well as, provide employment for thousands of graduates with sophisticated courses. Nothing came out of this idea due to corruption which evolved from bad to worst!

And, finally, the once rice-exporting proud nation has become an importer of rice from countries whose rice technicians derived their knowledge from the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), in Los Baῆos, Laguna – Philippines!

That is the gloomy picture and sad story of a country called, “Pearl of the Orient Seas”, somewhere in the Pacific. It is my country, but, I am still proud of it…though vehemently pray and hope that it will someday be transformed into a better place to live in, with the united effort of the persistent fellow countrymen who still remain “true” Filipinos…at all cost!


0

The Filipino-Style of Democracy Today...inept and disastrous, enjoyed by the few!

Posted on Monday, 3 August 2015

The Filipino-Style of Democracy Today
…inept and disastrous, enjoyed only by the few!
By Apolinario Villalobos


During the American regime, particularly under the Harrison administration, Filipinization of the government gained momentum. The effort of Harrison was criticized by the Americans who perceived the Filipinos as ill-prepared, hence, needed more “training” but the kind of a “hands off” not “hands on”, which means that they should not be given direct responsibilities, to give them time to better absorb the essence of democracy. Despite the criticisms, however, Harrison, allowed the Filipinos to have a taste of self-rule, though, with lesser control, until finally, they were left on their own.

The American Constitution was the basis of the country’s own. Except for the federal form of the American government, all other aspects of the democratic system were copied. Clearly now, while practically, the American democracy was embraced by the Filipinos, its essence was not absorbed suitably. The freedom granted by the Americans nurtured the much-abused Filipino-style of democracy which, in time, became deeply-rooted, making the resulting corruption, very difficult to eradicate.

Today, the result is devastating, as such kind of democracy, is replete with abuse, being founded on kinship, gratitude and friendship. The traditional practice which had been going on since the colonial days, was never eradicated, but just got worse during the time of Harrison. It was more prevalent, though, in the lower rungs of the political system, yet. Such practice was strongly observed by the Americans in general, that is why, the freedom given to the Filipinos was perceived by them to be “unripe” and untimely.

Overly nationalistic Filipinos proudly declare that it is better to be ruled by a corrupt Filipino leader than by a foreigner. Lately, at the rate that the Filipino leaders are drowning the country in the muck of never-ending foreign-granted debts, the country’s economy has become foreign-fueled, therefore dictated by them, too, to insure the return of their “investment” complete with interest! In other words, the Filipino leaders have become puppets to these foreign lenders, making the country still foreign-ruled in a way! So, where is nationalism in such kind of a situation?

No doubt, the country has entered the new era of economic colonization. And, hypocrite Filipinos play blind and dumb to this reality, pretending that the country is still enjoying the benefits of a strong democracy. That could be true, but only for those who are in control of the government, their families, kin, and friends. The present president is undoubtedly tolerant of his critics, but democracy is not just about that. Is there democracy in the uncontrolled yearly increase in tuition fees, worsening unemployment, job contractualization, illegal mining and logging behind which are politicians and favored foreigners, yearly soaring of prices of basic commodities, and pocketing of people’s money by corrupt government officials?

A suggestion is changing the form of government, by decentralizing it. In other words, why not give federalism, a try? The essence of democracy is still the nucleus of this system, but grumblings from those with different culture will be eliminated, because with the decentralization, they can have the opportunity of ruling themselves, though on a controlled capacity. And, with the shrinking of covered areas, operation of the “federal states” can be controlled more efficiently, minimizing at least, the occurrence of corruption.

Along this line, the successful autonomous region of the Cordillera has shown that it can be done, followed by the Autonomous Region for Muslim Mindanao which can be just enhanced for the sake of the Bangsamoro. A few more steps leading towards the creation of other regions throughout the country may result to the much-sought peace, albeit limited, due to the still prevailing pockets of insurgency and banditry. At the end, what the country will enjoy would indeed, be the true Filipino-style of democracy!


0

An Observed Fault in my Blog...thanks to a meticulous viewer

Posted on Monday, 15 June 2015



An Observed Fault in my Blog
…thanks to a meticulous viewer
By Apolinario Villalobos

Here’s a letter of explanation and gratitude to a meticulous viewer of my blogs, who observed a fault in my latest on “Democracy”…..

Hi, Perl….

My blog re “Democracy…” is some kind of a conclusion, after a series of blogs on corruption. Unfortunately, it has no “accompanying” background or basis. I presumed that with so many blogs that I made about corruption that touched on the metamorphosis of the “new” Philippines after the Martial Law that started under Cory Aquino up to the present, showing that corruption has just worsened, I presumed that viewers will recall my past blogs as basis for my latest on democracy. The past blogs showed that the administrations of Aquino, Ramos, Estrada, Arroyo, and now, another Aquino, Pnoy…are oblivious to the unscrupulous abuse of democracy.

Based on the past “corruption blogs”, my latest on democracy implied that it has been grossly abused, that’s all I wanted to say. The Senate and Congress where lawmakers can be found, proved to be questionable in their democratic character, even the executive and judiciary branches, and still, even the police, because of unchecked corruption. The blog is a hanging conclusion which means that, if somebody can do something to remedy the situation, such opinion will be changed. Still unfortunately, I did not mention the Philippines in the blog because what was in my mind were the Filipino fb viewers.  So I am thinking now that foreigners will definitely think that I am a communist after viewing it in wordpress, blogspot, twitter and Tumbler. I am grateful to you because I came to realize such oversight. My plan was actually to just post it only on my fb and not on the rest of my sites, but “automatically”, without much thought, I opened the said sites and uploaded the blog as some kind of my routine act. I will be forced to make a rejoinder to that blog, again, thanks to you for patiently checking my materials.

My problem in blogging is that if I shorten the material, it hangs in mid-air just like what happened to “Democracy….”. If I make the material thorough, making it long, just like what I did to “Ang Mga Pagkakamali ni Binay” and others, some viewers complain which I understand because I found out that many of them use smartphone only. If I really make my presentations concise, I might end up with enumerated bullet statements. Some viewers outside my loop, are even requesting for Pilipino and English translations, to which I comply. They are those who are able to view my blogs as shared/pasted on sites of other viewers. I receive their requests via email.

Here’s my sequence of action every time I open the computer: I check the email page first, because that is where your messages come in and act on them, while leaving the rest of messages which every day total almost 300, but go back to them shortly, later on; then I upload my blogs on fb, wordpress, blogspot and Tumbler. It is a good thing that whatever I blog on wordpress also gets published on twitter and fb. But still, I have to do a separate upload on fb for the convenience of viewers who have no time to open my wordpress, blogspot, or Tumbler sites.  All these take 3 to 4 hours to do, giving me no time to browse the internet. I check the fb of friends for my update only three times a week during which I spend a longer time with my laptop.

Another big problem is the signal that is intermittently cut off, even for as long as about an hour. I just use a USB broadband for which I buy load of fifty pesos per use, and sometimes, I go to my neighbor who has a WIFI. I did not get a monthly post-plan as I find it costly and impractical, not suitable for a struggling blogger like me. The signal problem forces me to faithfully follow the sequence I mentioned which necessitates uploading first, so that in case the signal gets worse, or will not reconnect, my viewers can already have something to read. The rest of my time, I use doing random acts of you-already-know-what out in the field.

Rest assured that next time I will be more careful and not get confused because of the many sites that I use. I consider your comments on my blogs valuable. With this is my assurance still, that I hate communism to its very essence.

God bless you!...the same wish goes to the rest of the patient viewers, who read this share.

Bot V

0

The Weakness of Democracy

Posted on Sunday, 14 June 2015



The Weakness of Democracy
By Apolinario Villalobos

Democracy supposedly, safeguards the rights of citizens, but it also gives them an opportunity to look for loopholes in its system to be used as tools for exploitation and oppression.

Democracy is hypocrisy. The principle purports to uphold freedom, but the same freedom is also given to those who have the penchant to oppress and exploit others. The system merely encourages the squabble among the citizens…with the strong having the obvious better chance to survive.

Corruption and injustice are the unspoken essence of democracy. They are the alibis that whitewash its real image. Leaders are supposedly chosen freely by citizens through election. Their having been chosen has practically become their “legal authority” to manipulate those who chose them by coming up with self-serving laws.

Democracy is not an ideal foundation for a better life. It can crumble because of abuse by the opportunist. In other words, democracy does not guarantee a blissful life for the weak.


0

The Failure of Democracy in the Philippines

Posted on Thursday, 21 May 2015



The Failure of Democracy in the Philippines
by Apolinario Villalobos

The first abuse of freedom, perhaps, could be what is told in the legend about the Paradise. God supposedly put Adam there and later from his rib, Eve was created, so that he would not be lonely. They had free will, freedom to do what they wanted. Unfortunately, Eve abused this when she gave in to the temptation of the serpent who told her about the “tree of life” in that Paradise. As the legend goes, she partook of a fruit with which she tempted Adam who readily gave in, using his free will.

Today there are free countries, ruled with democracy which is perceived to be the best because of its principles rammed down the throat of adherents. But in reality, it has many weaknesses, as its very principle made it prone to abuse of all kinds. Because of freedom supposedly as its essence, people are left to practically do whatever they want. Of course there are laws that are supposed to curtail their acts, but because of corruption, indolence and indifference, they are not implemented -  a very unfortunate reality.

In this world, when it comes to governance, man is left with either, democracy with its freedom, or socialism with its dictatorship. The character of each is not free from the taint of abuse and corruption. So, what is left is a choice for the least evil between the two.

The problem with democracy is that criminals for instance, are presumed innocent unless proved guilty, even when caught in the act or despite evidences pointing to the commission of guilt! To prove such commission, a process has to be followed in which witnesses have to issue statements under oath and lawyers must be hired… woe then to the victim who cannot afford to hire a bright lawyer! The government provides free services of its lawyers for the poor, but most often, they are not as reliable as the hired ones in view of the obvious reason.

The Philippines as a young republic seems to have been forced into “maturity”. The haste did not give time for the essence of democracy to be properly inculcated in the mind and heart of the Filipinos. Enthusiastic, after having been freed from the clutches of the Spaniards who for long subjugated the islands, the early leaders went ahead in copying the “democracy” of other countries, without giving much thought on the nature and temper of the Filipinos as an Asian race.

While cuddled by America, a country with a federal system of government, the early leaders opted for the presidential form of other countries. Today, as the diverse regional differences of the country is emphasized when the people began to protest loudly due to the unfairness in the distribution of benefits and services, some sectors realized that the Philippines may have been better off with a federal system of government than the present one that is treading on uncertainties and volatile ground.

The uncontrolled surge of corrupt practices due to lack of control and defective operating system of the government, are now blamed on the location of the central government and the dissected state of the country, being an archipelago.

Corruption has been the issue ever since the country had its first president. This reality has been stressed during the time of Diosdado Macapagal and the same was  used by Ferdinand Marcos to win the sympathy of the people. His intelligent perception made him use the issue as the centerpiece of his administration, giving him an alibi to declare Martial Law. Unfortunately, instead of using the new set up for the betterment of the nation, he also abused it that eventually spelled his downfall. Instead of healing the wound of the people the dictatorship became the proverbial salt that aggravated the tingling hurt.

The Marcos dictatorship was toppled by the “People Power”, a mass movement that has become a trademark of the Filipinos in the world of politics, although, for a short period of time. It has purportedly become an embarrassment later for the Filipino people as those in the know were saying that it was a sham movement for democracy – a manipulated one, by the opportunistic people who habitually change their color to blend with whatever administration holds the reins of the government. Its sparkle waned after just four commemorations as those “originally” identified with the movement, carefully kept their distance from the people behind it, ashamed and feeling guilty that they have been part of the sham.

Today, corruption has just worsened, assuming a “free for all” semblance . The series of corrupt act starts at the time politicians campaign for position during which vote buying has shamelessly became the norm. This is followed by the blatant manipulation of budget involving non-governmental organizations, up to the point of padding of budgets for major infrastructure projects – all done by those whose seat in the government has been practically paid for in cash during the election.

While there are investigations going on, the barrage of accusations and denials that fill the airwaves and pages of print media is even made more circus-like by hearings that the Filipinos in general doubt will really achieve their goal. What the people perceive is the use of this hype in the legislative halls as tools to earn media mileage in favor of ambitious political personalities who would like to sit in the Malacaῆan Palace.

To make it short, democracy as supposedly an ideal governance failed in the Philippines.