It is High Time for the President to be Assisted by Career Service Officers (CSOs)
Posted on Thursday, 10 September 2015
It is High Time for
the President of the Philippines
To be Assisted by
Career Service Officers (CSOs)
By Apolinario Villalobos
The Career Service Officers (CSOs), in doing their duties
and responsibilities, are bound to the Civil Service guidelines. Their failure
could mean suspension, dismissal or imprisonment – after due process. Their
positions are supposed to be sanitized, hence, non-political. There is no
reason therefore, why they cannot cooperate with any sitting President as it is
their duty to do so, for as long as they are within bounds of the guidelines,
otherwise, they can be meted appropriate penalties. Compare this with erring
politically-appointed agency Heads who just shrug their shoulders with
indifference, because they are friends of the President, hence, untouchable and
excused from prosecution!
The Career Service Officers are considered “managers” with
ample trainings and knowledge on how to run agencies. They also rise from the ranks
making them well-versed on all aspects of operations. The government is assured
of the best performance possible, because they have their career path to take
care of. Any mistake could mean their being sidetracked or worse, removed from
the path. In other words, they have reasons to work as best as they can, if
they want to grow professionally, thereby, forced to earn their keeps honestly
and earnestly.
On the other hand, political appointees, have only their
loyalty to the sitting President as credential. It is true that some may have
earned their diplomas and certificates of masters and doctorates from reputable
colleges and universities here and abroad, but these are just papers for show,
to gain favorable impression. They are degree holders but with stagnant
knowledge due to lack of practice in actuality, because their involvement is in
politics which for them is a more “rewarding” career. There may be some,
however, who before their appointment, may be holding “similar job” or with
“similar function” in private companies. But the environment in a government
agency is very much different from that of a private company, making the
“similarities” not a guarantee of acceptable or exemplary performance.
What the nation needs are “honest-to-goodness” workers with
accumulated experience and exposure in agency operation. For instance, the
Department of Social Welfare needs Social Workers who have been working with it,
thereby, exposed to the real situations for a number of years making them fully
understand the sentiments and the needs of the socially-deprived people, and
not just somebody who became close to the President after several toasts in
social gatherings, or somebody who claps the loudest in the middle of his
speech.
In some cases, the political appointees, aside from being
co-terminus with the appointing President, may also be nurturing an ambition to
run for an elective position. When campaign period for election sets in or if
the President is approaching the end of his term, they leave their agencies in
a quandary due to unclear directions for the continuity of projects, and which
is worse, if another political appointee takes over. How about “official
turnover” as some sympathizers of the government would ask?….to them I say,
“tell that to the marines!”. The government is so dysfunctional that it seems,
agencies do not even know what “coordination” means! It is different if the Agency Head is
permanent, as project implementation will not change direction, while
Presidents come and go. These permanent Career Service Officers are protected
by their eligibility, so that no political ignoramus can ever budge them from
their position, not even the President…that is, if the Civil Service guidelines
shall be followed to the letter.
Lately, very clear circumstances point to the necessity of
professionalizing the administration of the Republican government, in order to
remove the taint of politics in its administration. Since the Commonwealth
period, the administrative system of the Philippines has been founded on
traditional “utang na loob” or gratitude and sympathy. The worried American
Governor Generals saw and felt this, making them apprehensive and conclude that
the Filipinos were not ripe for self-rule yet, at the time. The perpetuated
tradition became a habit, and now Filipinos suffer from the result.
As a practice, Presidents chose people who contributed much
for their election, to saucy positions in his administration as an “assurance
for smooth operation” and continued support. Presidents chose people whom they
can trust with cooperation for quick release of funds. Presidents chose pea-brained
people to head agencies that are directly involved with the voting base of the
population, especially, the poverty-stricken who are always ready to bite
dangled morsels of insignificant relief. The practice has nurtured the growth
of a deeply-rooted corrupt system that eventually ruined the Filipino culture. What
we see today is a country that needs a drastic change to turn it around, for
the better.
Personally, as a last resort, I maintain a change in the
system from the centralized to federal….
Discussion