The Shabby Scenes from the Airport Terminals and the Derelict Intramuros and Liwasang Bonifacio
Posted on Friday, 8 May 2015
The Shabby Scenes
from the Airport Terminals
and the Derelict Intramuros
and Liwasang Bonifacio
By Apolinario Villalobos
The problem with the Department of Tourism is that, while it
promotes touristic destinations in the countryside, it forgot Manila which is
supposed to be the gateway. The agency is proud of the oceanic theme park at
the back of the Luneta grandstand and also the “dancing fountain”. But those
can be found anywhere as they have become ordinary fixtures of parks, with some
provinces even having more picturesque and enticing dancing fountains. The
tourism people seem blind to the shabby scenes from the airport terminals that
surely catch the eyes of incoming tourists on their way to their hotels along
Roxas Boulevard and Makati Business Center.
From the Terminal 1 and 2 for instance, what catch the eyes
are big bill boards and ramshackle shanties of barangay Pildera. The patroness
of air voyage looks forlorn with the neglected shrubs at the base of its
pedestal. Trees that line the street are untrimmed. Pieces of garbage dot the
ground with wilting grass due to neglect. From Terminal 3, the same monotonous
view greets the visitors as they drive down Andrews Avenue toward Baclaran and
Tramo. From terminal 4, the short distance to Airport Road of Baclaran is
worst, especially, as one exits towards Roxas Boulevard, with both sides of the
street lined with run-down beerhouses.
The clusters of modern edifices that are filling the
reclaimed Manila bay are being developed by owners of the business establishments,
themselves who are mostly foreigners. In this regard, the Department of Tourism
has no right to claim the credit for the fast transition of the once grassy
reclaimed land.
Intramuros at the northwest terminus of Roxas Boulevard is
supposed to be the historical showcase of the city, together with Liwasang
Bonifacio or Lawton Plaza. Unfortunately, both are awful disappointments. What
makes Intramuros interesting a bit, are just the presence of Manila Cathedral,
San Agustin Church, and some of its streets lined with old houses that are not
even refurbished to improve their antiquated facades. What worsen the
disappointing landmark are the filthy skeletons of neglected government
buildings and stinking nooks of the once formidable walls and their imposing
bastions.
Liwasang Bonifacio’s conspicuous landmarks are the Post
Office Building and the fountain behind the statue of Andres Bonifacio. But the
grounds are always littered with refuse. The public toilet is perpetually
closed and has become the abode of vagrants. The police precinct under the
flyover lacks decency in appearance, though, fairly clean. The vacant lots have
become dumping grounds for practically everything. The once glorified
Metropolitan Theater because of its exquisite beauty is now an eyesore.
Entrances and exits to the underpasses are lorded over by vagrants and
rugby-sniffing street urchins. Ironically, the Manila City Hall, is just
several meters away!
Several years ago, a foreign student blogged the dirty
public toilets that stink due to the absence of water, with cracked and grimy
tiles, lack of tissue paper, doors without lock, and lack of lighting fixtures.
Instead of being thankful, the government reacted negatively, threatening the
poor student with deportation unless he apologized publicly which he did, when
all he wanted was just to call the attention of the negligent government
agencies, particularly the Department of Tourism and concerned local government
units.
And now, the Department of Tourism (DOT) is located in a
busy section of Makati, and housed in a building – far from the people that it
is supposed to assist. Its location can be accessed with much difficulty due to
heavy traffic along the way. The agency should have made use of common sense in
relocating itself within the “tourist belt” to serve its purpose with
propriety. If the DOT is renting and how much, I dare not say more…
Discussion